Here’s an old write up I found from a couple years ago about a group of people who used to meet once a week at a local restaurant in Marysville. I wrote this one evening after attending one of the groups meetings. The best part about it is that I am now good friends with the person who captured my attention that evening (Hahn, you’re the man and you taught me a lot that night). Although the group no longer meets, the message behind that evening is a very important one, and one that came up last Sunday at Mosaic as we looked at the Church at Smyrna in our series on the Book of Revelation. So here’s a blast from the past and challenge to all of us to learn how to “Live The Pain.”
(March 2008)
“The great challenge is living your wounds through instead of thinking them through. It is better to cry than to worry, better to feel your wounds deeply than to understand them, better to let them enter into your silence than to talk about them. The choice you face constantly is whether you are taking your wounds to your head or your heart. In your head you can analyze them, find their causes and consequences, and coin words to speak and write about them. But no final healing is likely to come from that source. You need to let your wounds go down to your heart. Then you can live through them and discover that they will not destroy you.” ~Henri Nouwen
Last night I hung out with a group of people–some friends, some aquaintences, some I did not know–in the back room of a little restaraunt in Marysville, WA. There were probably 25 people crammed in the small room. The group has named itself the “Armchair,” and is a place where people can come together once a week to discuss topics ranging from philosophy, theology and anthropology to history, art, photography and the like. Once, I even entered into a discussion about architecture–something I know absolutely nothing about.
This group was started by a couple of Christian men whom I have the pleasure of calling friends. We are part of the same Christian community (Mosaic) and have similar hearts to live incarnationally. If anything, we hope God will give us the grace to add some sort of beauty into the world around us. While I fail at my task all too aften, these guys – Moses and Neil – have started something that is a sure depiction of beauty.
The Armchair is open to Christians and non-Christians alike. Last night, the room was about equally split. The discussion centered around the 4th chapter in the Book of Ecclesiastes–the issue of injustice even for the righteous. Not to be outdone by Koheleth, the author of Ecclesiastes, who makes some startling observations about injustice, the people of Armchair decided to make some startling observations of their own. Where Koheleth used words to depict injustice, the people at Armchair used pictures. They passed around two laptop computers with extremely graphic photographs depicting injustice around the world. We were then each asked to describe our feelings. Some felt obligated and motivated to action, some simply cried. I, myself, felt what Koheleth must have felt when he wrote the words, “Meaningless, Meaningless, all is utterly meaningless.” I felt hopeless. All the pain in the world; all the suffering; all the injustice. How is one supposed to find meaning (much less hope) in a world with so much pain and suffering?
And then the meeting ended in a powerful way. After many of us (myself included) tried to rationalize our feelings towards these grotesque images, one young man (a non-Christian) began to cry almost uncontrollably. When asked to share his feelings, he explained that he usually uses one of two “shields” when facing serious issues–He either makes jokes to lighten the mood, or he just decides to ignore the problem. As he sat there crying, realizing that he could tell no jokes to ease the pain captured within the pictures, and realizing that the only other option within his arsenal of “sheilds” is to ignore the problem, he came to the simple conclusion, “There’s something seriously wrong with me.”
Like Father Nouwen wrote about in the quote above, this young man stopped trying to think through the issue of pain and suffering and instead allowed himself to live it. Even if only for a brief moment, he allowed the pain of others to enter his own being. Only then did he come to the realization that something within him was broken… a necessary step if one hopes to work through the healing process.
Now imagine what would happen if he (and the rest of us) would allow our own pain to be felt rather than simply rationalized. We all have pain. We all suffer loss. And, like the gentleman from last night, we too make jokes to lighten the experience. We too choose to ignore the pain. We too choose to rationalize it so that we can find the words to discuss it; yet all the while we never find the place within our own being to experience our falleness, to realize our brokeness, and to ultimately find our healing.
Remember, the first step is to realize our brokeness (“There’s something seriously wrong with me”); only then can we experience the next step–that is, a showering of love from God and a declaration that our pain will not be the end of us. He is the hope for humanity. He is the one who can rescue us from us. His didn’t ignore our pain. He didn’t make jokes about our suffering. He is the one who suffered pain on our behalf–taking on our humanity, our sin, our punishment, our cross–so that through his heartfelt pain, he might add hope and beauty to our world. He is the solution to our dilemma – “We are all broken.”
Now go and do likewise.
1 Peter 2:20-23 (Endure Suffering as Jesus Did)
If you endure [being beaten] when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval. For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps.
’He committed no sin,
and no deceit was found in his mouth.’
When he was abused, he did not return abuse; when he suffered, he did not threated; but he entrusted himself to the one who judges justly.”
Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
What stood out the most as I read Gandhi’s words and learnt of his life was how much Gandhi attempted to let the teachings of Jesus actually affect the way he lived and treated other people (even those who mistreated him). In many ways, he seemed more like Christ than many Christians I know. Heck, forget other Christians; he seemed to reflect Christ more than I do on my best of days.
The ironic part of Gandhi’s story is that his Hindu nation was at that time under British rule and Britain was, of course, a Christian nation. Gandhi believed Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount involved a call to complete pacifism. Although I am not convinced this is true, the point is that Gandhi was convinced. (And admittedly there are some good reasons to come to such a conclusion.) He chose to follow what he believed Jesus taught even if the “Christian” Brits did not, and by doing so, he captured the attention of people around the world as he became the natural leader of a non-violent revolt against the British leaders of his country. What’s more amazing is that his non-violent approach worked. Gandhi and his obedient followers threw no punches; they fired no shots. And yet, in the end, India won her independence.
Gandhi once said, “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Now, I’m not saying all Christians must be pacifists (unless you are convinced Christ taught such things—if that’s the case, then you ought to live a life committed to non-violence no matter the cost), and I’m not making a political statement AT ALL. My point is that, as the beginning quote makes light of, there are many times when we as “born-again” Christians live in such a way, and act out towards other people in such a way, that makes them wish we’d “never been born the first time.”
What will really push some “born-again” buttons is that I’m not referring to some sort of sin. We all sin. Gandhi even admitted he was a sinner. Sin isn’t what makes people like Gandhi and others dislike Christians while still loving the life and teachings of Jesus. No, this is not some super-spiritual lecture on how Christians need to be holier-than-thou, or separate themselves from the outside world, or go to church 7 days a week, never smoke, drink, or curse (nor hang out with the “sinners” of the world who do such things). It’s actually the opposite. Those sorts of things are often put forth as the answer to how a righteous person ought to live and that by doing so, nobody will think you’re a hypocrite and therefore, everyone will magically become Christian because of the “holy” life you live. I’m not convinced this is the case.
If “born-again” Christians make some people wish they’d never been born in the first place, then the life you’re living does not reflect Jesus. Do you authentically care about others (and can they tell that you do)? Do you make people smile when you’re around? Do you add to the quality of life, the quality of intellectual conversation, the quality of relationship? In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus told his followers that they were meant to be “salt and light.” But try shining a flashlight in someone’s eyes and see if they like it. Try rubbing salt in a person’s wound and see if they like it. Salt and light can do amazing things, but they can also be annoying as hell. Christ seemed to be the good kind of salt and the good kind of light. I get the feeling from Scripture that people (even “sinners”) really enjoyed hanging out with Jesus. They invited him and his gang to their parties. They laughed with him. They learned from him. It ought never be the case that a person should join Gandhi in saying, “I like your Christ, but I do not like you Christians. You people are nothing like your Christ.” This is simply unacceptable.