March 14 (Lent)

In light of Lent, I thought I’d share one of my favorite devotional books with you. It has daily readings from renowned spiritual writer, Father Henri J. M. Nouwen. I will try to post the short reading daily so that together we can take a journey of conversion during Lent and the Easter week. This journey is sure to help us become more sensitive to our inclinations toward sin and to Christ’s love which extends beyond all else. Through it all, Father Nouwen comforts and reassures us with reminders that God loves and accepts us even in our fallen human state. I know I need to experience such a journey. How about you?

Today’s Reading: “Heart of Courage”

QUOTE from Book:
The word “courage” comes from “coeur,” which means “heart.” To have courage is to listen to our heart, to speak from our heart, and to act from our heart….Often we debate current issues and express our opinions about them. But courage is taking a stance, even an unpopular stance, not because we think differently from others but because from the center of our being we realize how to respond to the situation we are in. Courage does not require spectacular gestures. Courage often starts in small corners: it is courageous not to participate in gossip, not to talk behind someone’s back, not to ridicule another. It is courageous to think well of other people and be grateful to them….It is courageous to reach out to a poor person, to spend time with a troubled child, to participate in action to prevent war and violence.

John 19:29-33 (“Courage of Conviction”)

[Jesus'] disciples said, “Yes, now you are speaking plainly, not in any figure of speech! Now we know that you know all things, and do not need to have anyone question you; by this we believe hat you came from God.” Jesus answered them, “Do you now believe? The hour is coming, indeed it has come, when you will be scattered, each one to his home, and you will leave me alone. Yet I am not alone because the Father is with me. I have said this to you, so that you may have peace. In the world you face persecution. But take courage; I have conquered the world!”

 

PRAYER from Book:
“Cherished God, give me true and heartfelt courage that brings strength, resilience, and determination to do what is right rather than what is expedient and convenient. Let m courage be seen in small ways that reflect the essence of your commandments: let me forgo gossip and sarcasm, exercise caution with placing blame, refuse to duck away from responsibility, speak wisely at the appropriate moment, and cultivate compassion and understanding. Let me be among those who have the courage of his or her convictions. Amen.”


LENTEN ACTION from Book
Choose a new tradition to observe this Lent; for example, decorate your home with reminders of the season (e.g., purple, incense, thorny branches), make a cross to adorn a home altar, or, imitating a Greek custom, place six feathers in a potato and remove one during each of the weeks of Lent.

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Lent | Leave a comment

Salt and Light?

“Why do ‘born-again’ people so often make you wish they’d never been born the first time?  ~Katherine Whitehorn, British Journalist, The Observer, May 20, 1979

       As a grad student, I wrote a research paper about the impact the Sermon on the Mount had on the person and life of Gandhi. I remember reading Gandhi’s autobiography and being amazed at how much of an impact the most famous teaching of Jesus had on this Hindu man. Although he denied the divinity of Christ, Gandhi believed that Jesus was a gift to See Morethe entire world and not simply a prize possession of the so-called Christian religion. Gandhi dreamt of a day when the whole human race would lend ear to this Jewish Rabbi’s teaching.
       What stood out the most as I read Gandhi’s words and learnt of his life was how much Gandhi attempted to let the teachings of Jesus actually affect the way he lived and treated other people (even those who mistreated him). In many ways, he seemed more like Christ than many Christians I know. Heck, forget other Christians; he seemed to reflect Christ more than I do on my best of days.
       The ironic part of Gandhi’s story is that his Hindu nation was at that time under British rule and Britain was, of course, a Christian nation. Gandhi believed Jesus’ teachings in the Sermon on the Mount involved a call to complete pacifism. Although I am not convinced this is true, the point is that Gandhi was convinced. (And admittedly there are some good reasons to come to such a conclusion.) He chose to follow what he believed Jesus taught even if the “Christian” Brits did not, and by doing so, he captured the attention of people around the world as he became the natural leader of a non-violent revolt against the British leaders of his country. What’s more amazing is that his non-violent approach worked. Gandhi and his obedient followers threw no punches; they fired no shots. And yet, in the end, India won her independence.
       Gandhi once said, “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Now, I’m not saying all Christians must be pacifists (unless you are convinced Christ taught such things—if that’s the case, then you ought to live a life committed to non-violence no matter the cost), and I’m not making a political statement AT ALL. My point is that, as the beginning quote makes light of, there are many times when we as “born-again” Christians live in such a way, and act out towards other people in such a way, that makes them wish we’d “never been born the first time.”
       What will really push some “born-again” buttons is that I’m not referring to some sort of sin. We all sin. Gandhi even admitted he was a sinner. Sin isn’t what makes people like Gandhi and others dislike Christians while still loving the life and teachings of Jesus. No, this is not some super-spiritual lecture on how Christians need to be holier-than-thou, or separate themselves from the outside world, or go to church 7 days a week, never smoke, drink, or curse (nor hang out with the “sinners” of the world who do such things). It’s actually the opposite. Those sorts of things are often put forth as the answer to how a righteous person ought to live and that by doing so, nobody will think you’re a hypocrite and therefore, everyone will magically become Christian because of the “holy” life you live. I’m not convinced this is the case.
       If “born-again” Christians make some people wish they’d never been born in the first place, then the life you’re living does not reflect Jesus. Do you authentically care about others (and can they tell that you do)? Do you make people smile when you’re around? Do you add to the quality of life, the quality of intellectual conversation, the quality of relationship? In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus told his followers that they were meant to be “salt and light.” But try shining a flashlight in someone’s eyes and see if they like it. Try rubbing salt in a person’s wound and see if they like it. Salt and light can do amazing things, but they can also be annoying as hell. Christ seemed to be the good kind of salt and the good kind of light. I get the feeling from Scripture that people (even “sinners”) really enjoyed hanging out with Jesus. They invited him and his gang to their parties. They laughed with him. They learned from him. It ought never be the case that a person should join Gandhi in saying, “I like your Christ, but I do not like you Christians. You people are nothing like your Christ.” This is simply unacceptable.
Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Live The Pain

       Here’s an old write up I found from a couple years ago about a group of people who used to meet once a week at a local restaurant in Marysville.  I wrote this one evening after attending one of the groups meetings.  The best part about it is that I am now good friends with the person who captured my attention that evening (Hahn, you’re the man and you taught me a lot that night).  Although the group no longer meets, the message behind that evening is a very important one, and one that came up last Sunday at Mosaic as we looked at the Church at Smyrna in our series on the Book of Revelation.  So here’s a blast from the past and challenge to all of us to learn how to “Live The Pain.”

(March 2008)

       “The great challenge is living your wounds through instead of thinking them through.  It is better to cry than to worry, better to feel your wounds deeply than to understand them, better to let them enter into your silence than to talk about them.  The choice you face constantly is whether you are taking your wounds to your head or your heart.  In your head you can analyze them, find their causes and consequences, and coin words to speak and write about them.  But no final healing is likely to come from that source.  You need to let your wounds go down to your heart.  Then you can live through them and discover that they will not destroy you.”  ~Henri Nouwen
     
       Last night I hung out with a group of people–some friends, some aquaintences, some I did not know–in the back room of a little restaraunt in Marysville, WA.  There were probably 25 people crammed in the small room.  The group has named itself the “Armchair,” and is a place where people can come together once a week to discuss topics ranging from philosophy, theology and anthropology to history, art, photography and the like.  Once, I even entered into a discussion about architecture–something I know absolutely nothing about.
       This group was started by a couple of Christian men whom I have the pleasure of calling friends.  We are part of the same Christian community (Mosaic) and have similar hearts to live incarnationally.  If anything, we hope God will give us the grace to add some sort of beauty into the world around us.  While I fail at my task all too aften, these guys – Moses and Neil – have started something that is a sure depiction of beauty.  
     The Armchair is open to Christians and non-Christians alike.  Last night, the room was about equally split.  The discussion centered around the 4th chapter in the Book of Ecclesiastes–the issue of injustice even for the righteous.  Not to be outdone by Koheleth, the author of Ecclesiastes, who makes some startling observations about injustice, the people of Armchair decided to make some startling observations of their own.  Where Koheleth used words to depict injustice, the people at Armchair used pictures.  They passed around two laptop computers with extremely graphic photographs depicting injustice around the world.  We were then each asked to describe our feelings.  Some felt obligated and motivated to action, some simply cried.  I, myself, felt what Koheleth must have felt when he wrote the words, “Meaningless, Meaningless, all is utterly meaningless.”  I felt hopeless.  All the pain in the world; all the suffering;  all the injustice.  How is one supposed to find meaning (much less hope) in a world with so much pain and suffering?
     And then the meeting ended in a powerful way.  After many of us (myself included) tried to rationalize our feelings towards these grotesque images, one young man (a non-Christian) began to cry almost uncontrollably.  When asked to share his feelings, he explained that he usually uses one of two “shields” when facing serious issues–He either makes jokes to lighten the mood, or he just decides to ignore the problem.  As he sat there crying, realizing that he could tell no jokes to ease the pain captured within the pictures, and realizing that the only other option within his arsenal of “sheilds” is to ignore the problem, he came to the simple conclusion, “There’s something seriously wrong with me.” 
     Like Father Nouwen wrote about in the quote above, this young man stopped trying to think through the issue of pain and suffering and instead allowed himself to live it.  Even if only for a brief moment, he allowed the pain of others to enter his own being.  Only then did he come to the realization that something within him was broken… a necessary step if one hopes to work through the healing process. 
     Now imagine what would happen if he (and the rest of us) would allow our own pain to be felt rather than simply rationalized.  We all have pain.  We all suffer loss.  And, like the gentleman from last night, we too make jokes to lighten the experience.  We too choose to ignore the pain.  We too choose to rationalize it so that we can find the words to discuss it; yet all the while we never find the place within our own being to experience our falleness, to realize our brokeness, and to ultimately find our healing.  
     Remember, the first step is to realize our brokeness (“There’s something seriously wrong with me”); only then can we experience the next step–that is, a showering of love from God and a declaration that our pain will not be the end of us.  He is the hope for humanity.  He is the one who can rescue us from us.  His didn’t ignore our pain.  He didn’t make jokes about our suffering.  He is the one who suffered pain on our behalf–taking on our humanity, our sin, our punishment, our cross–so that through his heartfelt pain, he might add hope and beauty to our world.  He is the solution to our dilemma – “We are all broken.”
     Now go and do likewise.
  
1 Peter 2:20-23 (Endure Suffering as Jesus Did)
     If you endure [being beaten] when you do right and suffer for it, you have God’s approval.  For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps.

               ’He committed no sin,
                    and no deceit was found in his mouth.’

     When he was abused, he did not return abuse; when he suffered, he did not threated; but he entrusted himself to the one who judges justly.” 

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Self-fulfilling prophecy–”a prediction that directly or indirectly causes itself to become true, by the very terms of the prophecy itself.”

       A woman told me a story about a time when she and her husband were on vacation. They were walking down the street window shopping. As the wife pauses at one window display, the husband crosses the street ahead of her to look at a different store front. Suddenly, the wife is approached by a frantic woman who asks, “Are they talking about me?” The wife responds, “Is WHO talking about you?” The paranoid woman persists, “Are they talking about me? I know they’re talking about me. Everyone’s talking about me.” The wife tries to calm the lady down by assuring her that nobody is talking about her and that everything is going to be okay. This seems to work and the woman walks away. The wife then hurries across the street, meets her husband and tells of the strange encounter with the paranoid lady. The husband asks, “Which lady are you talking about?” As the wife turns and points across the street and informs her husband, “That lady over there,” she feels her heart sink as the paranoid woman turns around just in time to catch the wife pointing at her and talking about her.
       This is a classic case of what sociologists and psychologist call self-fulfilling prophecy. The wife became everything the paranoid lady was freaking out about. But had the lady not been paranoid and not assumed that everyone was talking about her, the wife would not have had any reason to talk and point. It was the self-fulfilling prophecy that turned the wife into someone she wasn’t–a talker and a pointer.
       When I heard the story, it reminded me of my first psychology class I took at college, where we discussed self-fulfilling prophecies. We fall victim to self-fulfilling prophecies more than we probably realize.
       Sometimes we are the frantic lady. We are paranoid about something which somehow actually brings about in others the very thing for which we are paranoid. An easy example would be if I constantly accuse people of being argumentative. Others would either agree with me (proving me wrong–which is a self-defeating arguement but fits in nicely in this discussion) or, most likely, they will deny my claim and insist they are not argumentative. But the second they begin to argue with me about my assessment of them, I have made them into the very thing I assumed them to be in the first place–argumentative. Another simple example might involve me continually telling a friend that the one thing I hate in life is when people raise their voice or yell at me in conversations. Assume I keep repeating this mantra over and over again and perhaps even warn my friend that he or she better never raise his or her voice or the friendship will be over. After enough times of talking about it, my friend may finally raise his or her voice in utter frustration and say, “I don’t yell at you! Stop it already!” And, you guessed it, the self-fulfilling prophecy has claimed another victim.
       At other times, we are the on the flip side of the coin. Rather than being the frantic woman who thinks everybody is talking about her, we are the wife who is helplessly transformed into the presuppositions of somebody else’s paranoia. We become the person who points to and talks about the frantic woman, argues with the person who claims we’re argumentative, or finally yells at the person who won’t shut up about how bad it would be if we raised our voice to them, and so on. We unwillingly become transformed by another person’s self-fulfilling prophecy. And, like the wife who got caught pointing across the street while talking to her husband, our hearts sink even though it’s not our fault that the prophecy was fulfilled by us.
       All that to say, try to avoid self-fulfilling prophecies of this nature. Don’t cause others to be transformed into something they’re not by means of this stupid, but very prevalant, psychological phenomena. And don’t allow your heart to drop or your self-esteem to lessen simply because you get caught in the self-fulfilling prophecy of another person.
        I love psychology, but I hate it as well.

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Emotions – Good or Bad

“It’s not wrong to feel afraid, it is most unfortunate to live in fear of something that doesn’t exist” ~Gary Smalley

       During my high school years, I became convinced of the theology that “fear” is the opposite of “faith.” Admittedly, some fear really is the opposite of faith, and there are biblical texts which support the theory. But not all fear fits into this catagory. Let’s say I make a decision and later realize that the decision I made was probably not the best one. As I’m slowly coming to this conclusion I might say something like, “I fear I have made a terrible decision.” This fear is not the opposite of faith. It would be much worse for me to assume in “faith” that every decision I make is the right one. If I did this, I would never learn from my mistakes, nor would I ever learn to make new decisions to replace my old ones. Simply put, not all fear is the opposite of faith.

       Our emotions are not always bad (even those that feel negative–e.g., fear, sorrow, anxiety, etc). Emotions have the potential of serving as safety mechanisms which we intuitively use to protect ourselves. They can act sort of like our nerve endings act when we put our hand on a hot stove. If we had no nerve endings, no way to sense pain, we would naïvely leave our hand on the stove and do serious damage to ourselves. It is the feeling of pain which protects us. Our nerve endings send a signal to our brain and we react in self-preservation by removing our hand from the stove. Both physical pain and emotional fear (or anxiety, sorrow…) are tools we can use to protect ourselves and therefore can be very beneficial.

       Now, that being said, emotions can also deceive us. To continue the comparison with our physical nerve endings, I have heard stories of people who have had limbs removed, such as a leg, and yet wake up in the night because their leg itches. They go to scratch it, only to realize they don’t have a leg to scratch. It’s a very real sensation, but the itch isn’t in their leg (where they think it is), it’s a facade. It’s not based on reality. It’s only in their mind. In a similar manner emotions can deceive us. This is partially the reason I love reading Marcus Aurelius and other stoic philosophers who saw the potential deception of emotions, and thus denied them in lieu of rational logic.

       This is also why I liked Gary Smalley’s quote when I came across it last night in my reading. It avoids the two extremes: 1) it doesn’t assume that “fear” is the opposite of “faith.” He starts by saying, “It’s not wrong to feel afraid.” The guy is no stoic, and yet, 2) he doesn’t assume all emotions stem from reality. He writes, “It is most unfortunate to live in fear of something that doesn’t exist.” This, in my opinion, is a perfect balence.

       And how are we to know if what we fear actually exists (or, more generally speaking, if our emotions are leading us astray)? One way is to use our mind/logic. In the book of Colossians, St. Paul encourages everyone to seek knowledge and wisdom and then experience joy. Knowledge (Gr – gnosis) involves our understanding. It involves our thinking. It means we have to learn a thing or two. It has been said that knowledge is the acquisition of ‘truth’. Wisdom (Gr – sophia), on the other hand, is the application of that truth. It has to do with a person actually choosing to apply the knowledge he or she has aquired. Knowledge + Wisdom. Some could use the terms, Mind + Will. I’ve always said it this way: Right Thinking + Right Action. And what happens in the end? According to Paul, you will be filled with joy (Emotions).

       So, don’t neglect your emotions, but strive to put them in check with what you know and how you act upon that knowledge. Remember the order of things, Mind-Will-Emotions. Or, Right Thinking + Right Actions = Right Feeling. Emotions aren’t bad, but if we reverse the order we will often find ourselves living in fear of something that doesn’t exist…or worse.

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Self-Looking Glass Image

The Self-Looking Glass Image states that we view ourselves the way we think other people view us.

       This is an interesting concept in social psychology. Let’s say I walk onto a stage to play a drum solo in front of a crowd of professional drummers who I believe to be far more talented than I. And let’s say I assume that these people are all looking at me and thinking to themselves, “Matt sucks. I can’t believe we have to sit here and listen to him. He won’t play anything that we couldn’t play. He’s not going to ‘surprise’ us with anything new.” Now, with this in mind, the fact of the matter is that I will literally play worse than I am capable of playing. I will doubt my own abilities and I will begin to view myself the way I think the audience views me. I will view myself as an amateur and I will play as one.

       Now let’s assume, on the other hand, I walk into a room to play a drum solo and I know everyone in there thinks I’m the best drummer in the world. The audience has paid good money to hear me and they are all eager for me to start. They are already cheering before I even step on the stage. That will greatly affect the way I view myself. I am now a great drummer. I am now a professional. And I will literally play at the top of my abilities. My creativity will be heightened because I believe the audience views me as creative. My two solos before different audiences will be radically different based on how I think other people view me.

       That’s just one example, but the possible scenarios are endless. If I think you view me as likable, I’ll be likable. If I think you view me as funny, I’ll be more comical. If I think you view me as attractive, I will carry myself differently than if I think you view me as unattractive. Here’s my point. While this is a proven way in which the subconscious works, it can be both a benifit and a curse. The worst thing about the psychological phenomena is that it is not based off of reality, but only off of our perception of reality. The fact is, we don’t really know how other people view us. Remember, this whole notion is based on how we “think” other people view us. So, it just may be that we “think” someone views us negatively, when in reality they view us positively. Sadly, we will view ourselves negatively and that will affect how we act. What’s worse, once we begin to act with a false self-view, we may in turn cause that other person to actually think negatively of us based on our actions even though they didn’t begin with that picture of us. All because our assumption was wrong in the first place.See More

       Have you ever experienced this? How often do you make decisions based on the way you “think” other people view you (or will view)? I have spent some time now trying to assume others view me for the positive. It seriously helps in everything I do. I assume before I get up to teach that everyone in the room thinks I’m a great teacher. I assume when I get up to play an intrument that everyone thinks I’m a great musician. I assume when handling relationships that the other person greatly respects me in the terms of that relationship. And I really do opperate at a higher level than if I had assumed otherwise. I hope that by simply knowing this tendency within the human psyche, you can choose to rise above the negative affects of the Self-Looking Glass Image and can be a better you in whatever situation you find yourself in.

       Don’t let your fear of what other people “might” think affect your view of yourself or your ability to make wonderful decisions. And, from a Christian perspective, even if you are to succumb to the Self-Looking Glass Image, and if you are going to view yourself the way you think another person views you, then why not make that other person Christ? Why not see yourself the way God sees you. Admittedly, this means you’ll have to have a healthy view of God, but assuming you do, this will greatly affect the way you live your life. Just my random thought for the day.

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Perfect Gift of Imperfection

      Have you ever shown up to a birthday party without a gift?  It can be extremely embarrassing, especially when the party is for a child who is bold enough to ask you in front of everyone, “What’d you bring me?  It’s my birthday!”  When you are then forced to announce that you didn’t bring the child anything, the look on the child’s face says it all–eyes of sadness cut through you as you watch the child’s excited expectations held only moments earlier dissipate into thin air.  I must admit, I have shown up giftless to parties too many times.

      Now, before you judge me too harshly, I wonder if I might inquire of you the last time you showed up to a birthday party without a gift?  We’re all getting ready to celebrate a very important birthday on the 25th of next month.  I know this won’t be the first time somebody showed up without a gift.  I go to this party every year without fail, and each of you is always there.  So I’m sure we’ll all attend this year as well.  But what will we say when the birthday boy asks each of us the same question, “What’d you bring me?  It’s my birthday!”

      I know what some of you are thinking.  Some of you know which birthday party I’m talking about.  You know this is no ordinary person in whose honor we will be celebrating.  He is royalty.  He is the king who rules over the royal nation to which many of us pledge allegiance.  And he’s not really a young boy anymore either.  In fact, in the scheme of eternity he’s actually much, much older now.  So what gift will you bring to the party this year?  Perhaps this is the most perplexing of all birthday gifts, because the king already has everything.  And so the age-old question lingers luminously, “What do you get the person who already has everything?”

      This is the reason I’m writing.  If you’re looking for the perfect gift for the king who has everything, I know just the thing.  You.  Often the only thing we hold back from Christ is the one thing he has never held back from us–His very self.  He gave his life for our sake, and now all he asks is that we give him ours in return.  To be honest, it’s really the only thing a person could possibly give him for his birthday.  There’s nothing else.  And, like all gifts given at a birthday, the gift you give will be his forever more, to do with as he pleases.  You can’t take a gift back when you getup to leave the party at the end of the day.  The gift is really gone.  It is not yours anymore.  (Perhaps some of you have already given the king this gift at some previous birthday party, only to snag it back at the end of the night when you thought the king was preoccupied with other peoples’ gifts and so would not notice your grab-n-dash escape.  Trust me, that guy notices everything!)

      So there are only two options: 1) Offer the king your very life.  After all, it is the only gift you have.  It is the only gift he wants.  So let him now dictate your life since it is no longer yours, but his.  Or, 2) show up to Dec. 25th without a gift.  You keep yourself for yourself.  You live your life as you please.  Try to forget the fact that the Messiah gave his own life in order to purchase yours for himself.  Try to convince yourself that He died simply for the sake of you being free to live however you so choose.  Oh, don’t get me wrong, he is a great and good king and does desire you to be blessed.  In fact, he himself promises to bless you.  You don’t need to worry about blessing yourself, but only discover those blessings that are already there, that are hidden all around you. 

      Please, this Christmas, when you unavoidably find yourself at the Great King’s birthday party on Dec. 25th, don’t show up without a gift.  Choose option #1, for the only alternative would break his heart.

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Blame it on the Scape Goat–Part 2 (reprint from Matt’s myspace)

      As Christians we mustn’t lose sight of the cross. Some liberal theologians and non-Christian scholars have all but removed the cross from their doctrine, resulting in a philosophy of religion that falls far outside the pale of authentic Christianity. To put it plainly, it is impossible to take the cross out of Christianity and still have Christianity. But why the cross? Is there something unique about a death on two wooden beams that cannot be accomplished by any other means? What if Jesus had come to earth in the 21st century? Would a death penalty carried out by lethal injection, the electric chair, or a public hanging be capable of saving humanity? Moreover, would an abortion of the baby Jesus save us from our sins? Simply stated, what is it that actually saves us? Is it the two beams of wood? Is it simply Christ’s death (which could theoretically be accomplished through an abortion or a gun shot)? Hmmmm… A little history:

 

      In the early years of church history, Christians began to view the cross through the lens of the sacrificial Day of Atonement that the Jews called Yom Kippur. On this day, two important events took place. First, the high priest would sacrifice a perfect lamb and sprinkle its blood on the mercy seat in the Tabernacle. Thus, to approach the Lord one would have to come through “the blood of the lamb.” The Jews did not, however, believe the blood of this lamb actually removed their sins, but rather covered them. Therefore, the second important event would quickly follow the first. After the lamb was slain, the priest would then take a goat and sprinkle some of the leftover blood from the lamb on its head while praying that the sins of the people would be transferred onto the goat. The goat (called the scape goat), now carrying the sins of the people, would then be released into the wilderness, thus taking the sins of the people away from them. Both the sacrificial lamb and the sin-bearing “scape goat” became symbols by which Jesus was understood.

 

      If we view the cross through the lens of Yom Kippur we note three things:

 

1) Jesus is “The Lamb of God” - We gain access to the divine through the blood of Jesus only

 

2) Jesus is “The Scape Goat” - Our sins are not only covered, but are actually taken away from us.

 

3) The death of the lamb and the life of the goat are BOTH needed for salvation. Therefore, it is not only the death of Christ that saves, but the life of Christ as well. In other words, the Yom Kippur model would not allow for a modern day abortion of the Christ child. Looking through the lens of Yom Kippur, salvation is found through the incarnation, life, death, AND resurrection of Jesus.

 

      In this, I believe it’s possible (with some creative thinking) for all other theories to be fulfilled without committing to any single theory in particular. The simple reality is that whatever anger and wrath there may have been on the part of the Father, it exists no longer. Whatever control Satan may have had over mankind because of sin, it exists no longer. The only thing that remains is that faith in Jesus means everlasting life!!!

 

–Matt

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Theology | Leave a comment

Blame it on the Scape Goat–Part 1 (reprint from Matt’s myspace)

Jesus died on the cross for my sins.”

 

Why the cross? Why death? Why God’s only Son (whom we believe to be God himself)? Trying to make light of the cross has been a task on the forefront of Christian thought since the time of the Apostles. Early Church Fathers, theologians, the Reformers, pastors – all have continued to explore the necessity, meaning, and value of the Christ’s crucifixion on the cross. A few thoughts:

 

While the theories are numerous, a few are worth looking at. One thought is that Christ died as a ransom to save sinners. This “Ransom Theory” implies that God had to pay a ransom to the devil in order to redeem mankind from Satan’s power and captivity. Another theory is that Christ’s death was not so much a payment to the devil as it was to God the Father. In this theory, the Son of God died to appease the anger and wrath of the Father (which He held toward sinful humanity). Both of these theories place emphasis on Christ’s death for the salvation of the world because his death paid the price of our sin. Whether the price was paid to the devil or to God the Father is debated. Some have even suggested that Christ’s death was somehow a trick played on the devil, allowing Jesus access to the realm of the dead. Then, according to this third theory, while Jesus was in Hades he made a mockery of the devil, took the keys to death, set the prisoners free, and forever destroyed the power of hell when He resurrected from the dead. This “Victory” theory sees Christ’s resurrection as the key to salvation as opposed to the mere sacrificial death on the cross.

 

These are just a few of the many theories. To be honest, I don’t believe any single theory alone fully satisfies Scripture. The idea that God was required to barter with the devil to determine a “ransom” gives way too much credit to the devil. The idea of the Father killing the Son in order to appease His own anger and wrath towards mankind makes God the Father out to be some barbaric, child sacrificing, sadist – not to mention the fact that this displays too much separation between ”God” the Father and ”God” the Son. If we allow the oneness of the Trinity to weigh in here (at the risk of straying into Modalism), it’s as if the one true God was so upset with mankind that He decided to commit suicide by killing Himself on a cross, and that somehow made him feel better about the situation. And the idea that God had to deceive the devil in order to gain access into the realm of the dead makes God out to be a hypocrite – He deceives “the deceiver” in order to destroy the devil for his deception.

 

To be fair, each of these theories (and many others) have numerous verses which seem to support such a view. But the ramifications for holding firmly to any single view are troublesome to say the least. In Part 2 of this series I will offer a suggestion for a more generalized understanding of the cross. To be continued…

–Matt

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Theology | Leave a comment

What Makes You Tick?

      “What makes you tick?” -  I heard somebody use this phrase the other day.  It’s a funny little phrase.  Isn’t it?  It makes us sound like a bunch of stupid little alarm clocks walking around on two legs.  For some reason I always imagine that little clock-dude on Beauty and the Beast (don’t laugh… you know who I’m talking about, which means you watched Beauty and the Beast also).  Anyways, clocks tick.  That’s just what they do. 

      Here’s my point. “Ticking” is not what we do – we’re not clocks.  But we were all created to do somthing.  What is it that makes you do what you do (“tick”)?  What winds you up and gets you going in the direction that you know you need to go?  Simply stated, “What are you passionate about?”  You see, passion is a God-given gift that excites us and focuses our energy in a single direction.  Passion directs the heart, captivates the mind, and even overcomes many of our fears and insecurities.  Passion is the stuff in life that wakes you up in the morning.  It’s what you think about all day long.  It’s the very last thought to escape your mind as you drift off into a world of dreams.  In a very real sense, passion is what motivated Jesus to sacrifice his life for ours – we are his passion; YOU are his passion.  Passion is powerful! 

      I’m often asked by people, “Matt, how can I discover God’s purpose for my life?  Is there a such thing as destiny?  If so, what’s mine?”  If you have ever asked these questions, let me share two simple thoughts:

1) As a Christian, your purpose in life is always the Great Commission.  Show the world the love of Jesus Christ. (Matt 28; Mark 16:15-18)

2) Do whatever it is that you are passionate about.  The thing that keeps you up at night, the thing you write about, the thing you sing about, the thing you just can’t live without… THAT is your passion (and most likely your purpose).  

      Are you an artist (e.g. painter, singer, musician)?  Are you a teacher?  Are you a public speaker? Are you a care giver?  Are you a writer?  Do you dream about being a mother or a father?  What makes you tick?

–Matt

Share this: Twitter | StumbleUpon | Facebook | Delicious | digg
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment